Small and medium business and not for profit organizations (SMB) are becoming an easier target than previously understood when it comes to cybercrime. One of the largest problems for these businesses to understand is that they are a very easy target because of their size.
SMB’s do not have the resources or the financial support to spend large amounts of time and money on the protection of their business. This lack of investment means that they have a “just enough is good enough” attitude to the security of their business, this I am afraid, is false economy. No matter what the business, the theft of money, clients and / or Intellectual property will have a detrimental effect on the business if not actually putting it out of business.
The introduction of IPv6 in the near future will make the protection of SMB business that much harder. IPv6 is the next transmission protocol for the Internet and although it is understood by most technical people the basic understanding of the protocol is lost on 99% of the Internet user population.
The introduction of IPv6 as a transmission protocol will make it so much harder to protect your business and your users from the Internet. The introduction that HAS to be done, IPv4 has already run out of addresses, is being delayed partly because of the security implications of the new protocol.
I really hate it when i have to put calculations into a post, but the primary difference of the transmission protocols is the number of addresses IPv4 has 2 to the power of 32 ( 2 x 2 x 2 (32 times) where IPv6 has 2 to the power of 128 (number of stars in the galaxy plus a couple of billion).
The address pool is huge, but the management of that address pool is going to require some serious computing power and management. Is that management going to fall on government, industry or someone who is neutral?
I am not going to go into all of the difference but some of them are profound and will have major implications for all users but it will have the biggest effect on Government Departments, defence systems and business infrastructure. From a technical point of view it will be a vast improvement and some believe that it will speed up the Internet but the down side is also profound.
Security is going to be a major problem. The proliferation of attack vectors, spyware, malware, viruses and SPAM will mean that SMB’s will be under constant attack. Is that protection going to fall directly on the shoulders of business to find more expensive or prohibitive security systems, processes and compliance requirements or is there going to be some level of Government intervention.
I am sorry but I do not have the answer to that question and at the moment, to tell you the truth, I don’t believe that anyone else has either. Hopefully the powers that be will have an answer in the near future, definitely prior to the global switch, so that everyone is playing on the same field.